Coding in the Gray: Why Human Judgment Still Matters (part 2 of a 2-part series)
There is a LOT of talk these days about automation. Autonomous coding solutions that can code with near-perfect accuracy—and no human intervention. Providers picking a code from a drop-down menu, enabled by a computer-generated prompt, and voila: Maximized billing and denial-proof revenue.
We’re not buying it.
We’ve been hearing talk of autonomous coding since at least 2007-08, and it never seems to happen the way the predictions say.
Denials persist. Errors continue. And more myths are perpetuated.
What makes full coding automation a fiction, even in the age of AI?
Read Coding in the Gray: Why Human Judgment Still Matters (part 2 a 2-part series).
You may also like
Coding in the Gray: Why Human Judgment Still Matters (part 2 of a 2-part series)
There is a LOT of talk these days about automation. Autonomous coding solutions that can code with…
Inpatient Audit Storm Clouds
The Office of Inspector General (OIG) never rests. After taking on Medicare Advantage organizations and aggressive risk…
Coding in the Gray: Why Human Judgment Still Matters (part 1 of a 2-part series)
There is a LOT of talk these days about automation. Autonomous coding solutions that can code with near-perfect accuracy—and no human intervention. Providers picking a code from a drop-down menu, enabled by…
The State of Physician Queries
This new special report includes analysis of the new 2026 ACDIS/AHIMA query practice brief, as well as:…
Provider Incentives: A Guide to the Mid-Revenue Cycle
This special report outlines the effective, compliant use of provider incentives in the mid-revenue cycle. Included are...
Eye on Denials: A Norwood special report
Denials are being turned up, not down. But they’re happening in less noticeable and more insidious ways,…
