Coding in the Gray: Why Human Judgment Still Matters (part 1 of a 2-part series)
There is a LOT of talk these days about automation. Autonomous coding solutions that can code with near-perfect accuracy—and no human intervention. Providers picking a code from a drop-down menu, enabled by a computer-generated prompt, and voila: Maximized billing and denial-proof revenue.
We’re not buying it.
We’ve been hearing talk of autonomous coding since at least 2007-08, and it never seems to happen the way the predictions say.
Denials persist. Errors continue. And more myths are perpetuated.
What makes full coding automation a fiction, even in the age of AI?
Related News & Insights
Sharpies and stage lights: MUSC’s Tracy Ferro on outpatient CDI origins
Listen to the episode here (Spotify). At ACDIS 2026 I delivered an unofficial episode of Off the Record with my guest…
Medicare Annual Wellness Visits (AWVs) a fantastic risk adjustment tool–but don’t sleep on FFS
If you work in outpatient CDI you might have already reached the conclusion that the Medicare Annual…