Download Coding in the Gray: Why Human Judgment Still Matters (part 2 of a 2-part series)
Download the report on our resources page.
There is a LOT of talk these days about automation. Autonomous coding solutions that can code with near-perfect accuracy—and no human intervention. Providers picking a code from a drop-down menu, enabled by a computer-generated prompt, and voila: Maximized billing and denial-proof revenue.
We’re not buying it.
We’ve been hearing talk of autonomous coding since at least 2007-08, and it never seems to happen the way the predictions say.
Denials persist. Errors continue. And more myths are perpetuated.
What makes full coding automation a fiction, even in the age of AI?
Read Coding in the Gray: Why Human Judgment Still Matters (part 2 a 2-part series).
Related News & Insights
How Norwood changed an organization’s CMI trajectory–to the tune of $2.56M
A drop in case mix index (CMI) isn’t necessarily indicative of a problem. A high-performing surgeon leaves your hospital, observation cases tick up seasonally, and you get a short-term drop. …
CC/MCC changes in 2027 IPPS final rule: We summarize them for you
The 2027 IPPS final rule includes several CC/MCC reimbursement changes to diagnoses you should be aware of….